The UK Singles Chart is not what it used to be. Concentrated first-week
sales, virtually no climbers to speak of at all these days, and a general public
apathy towards a Top 40 boasting little in the way of long-term interest for
chart-watchers. So, tell us something we don't know.
Well, it seems the music industry is at a crucial crossroads, facing a
dilemma which could spell the end of the singles chart in its traditional
incarnation. Created in 1952 by the NME to replace the outmoded Sheet Music listings,
the UK chart has seen over 900 records make #1, but there are genuine fears that
the landmark 1000th chart-topper might never happen. This is because at its
current becalmed turnover rate of Number Ones (the slowest since the mid-90s)
it could take another three years, and with sales plummeting by more than 30%
in the first quarter of 2003 the future of singles themselves, let alone the
chart, is in real doubt.
To illustrate just how dire the situation is, the Year-To-Date rundown of the
biggest-selling singles in the UK includes just one release that has passed
half-a-million sales; the lame Comic Relief-inspired teaming of Gareth Gates
and the Kumars on Spirit In The Sky, which has sold 550,000 copies so far. The
alarm bells begin, however, when the rest of the top 10 reveals a paltry six
singles with sales over 250,000 copies, and a long-running hit such as
Evanescence's Bring Me To Life (4 weeks at No.1) isn't among them. For all their
ubiquity, the likes of Christina Aguilera's Beautiful and Cry Me A River by Justin
Timberlake have yet to sell even 200,000. Further down, boyband-of-the-moment
Busted have sold just 100,000 copies of their chart-topping You Said No.
Others, such as Liberty X, Mis-Teeq, Delta Goodrem and S Club, are also suffering.
There's no hiding from the fact that, plainly, singles simply aren't selling
anymore. But what to do about it?
With a typically myopic outlook the BPI, understandably alarmed at their
self-inflicted crisis, are seeking to reassess the structure of the UK chart;
possibilities include shifting the publication date to a Friday, and the age-old
nugget of introducing added elements into the mix such as airplay.
Of course,
neither option will rectify the mess the record companies, with the demographic
advertising-driven aid of the media, have made of the singles market. The chart
format, which has been in place for over 50 years, of a Monday-Saturday
retail window with the resulting tabulations compiled for publication shortly
after (the next day, in fact, since September 1987) is pretty foolproof. If the
chart has lost both its credibility and now its potency, no amount of
smoke-and-mirror tricks will hide the real reasons for the record-buying public's
waning interest and monetary investment in it. Namely:
Tracks are premiered and/or aggressively promoted on high rotation as much as
six weeks before the single is available to purchase in the shops. By the
eventual time of release, saturation point has long since come and gone, and
willingess to still part with £3.99 is quite naturally on the slide.
Pricing singles at more than 50% less on the week of release only, before
hiking everything up to the £3.99 maximum pricepoint thereafter, is always going
to skew the nature of chart activity towards first-week sales and swift
drop-offs.
CIN rules governing formats are ridiculously convoluted and often
nonsensical. The plethora of multi-format singles, endless remixes, and baffling
tracklistings that allow a CD without the recognisable version of the song, might
satisfy the demands of fanbases and the all-pervading dance music culture, but the
Singles Chart was designed to reflect mass popular tastes and appeal to
everyone, casual buyers included. CIN need to lay down stricter, clearer and fewer
regulations that simplify what is allowed rather than kowtowing to the
pressures of record companies always trying to flout the rules.
Performances and presentations of singles are rarely close to the recorded
version that appears on the actual single. Somewhere, in the cause of ill-judged
worthiness, miming has become the ultimate dirty word for Television
producers. Yet, if the music heard on a programme is invariably misleading to the
potential consumer (and the quality of the sound for live renderings on shows like
TOTP and CD:UK is woeful), what purpose does it serve to the wellbeing of the
UK chart?
Finally, there is far too much music issued every week. All the labels are
striving for the same Holy Grail - huge profits - but in copying each other to
the point where most of the new acts launched are facsimilies of something
already heavily represented, they are merely slicing up a diminshing pie in ever
smaller pieces. Increasing competition in a deflated market makes little sense,
but still they persist in flogging acts who have nothing new to say, and
nothing new in their music. The astonishing rise in female artists - and endless
stream of airbrushed, derivative, vacuuous acts clearly designed to succeed by
means of overtly sexual appeal and nothing else - reeks of the cynical,
unimaginative and manipulative obssessions of today's industry; run by arrogant
halfwits and controlled by grey accountants.
All of these aspects of our 21st-Century marketplace climate need to be
addressed before it's too late. The current set-up doesn't work in terms of overall
sales, and it's arguably killing pop music in the process. It's impossible to
give the public everything they want (numerous remixes, 12" double-packs,
spreading as many as 5 or 6 B-sides across two or more formats) and have that
reflected in a fair and structured weekly chart. Time to choose.
In an age when revenue from ringtones of popular songs eclipse that of
singles sales, perhaps any attempts to revive the market are doomed. Until the
industry comes out of denial, and tackles perceptions and trends of their own
making, sales will continue to fall and the chart's relevance will decrease even
further.
DVDs reviewed by the editor are watched on a Panasonic TXW32R4 32" widescreen TV
connected to either a Creative Dxr2 DVD-ROM player or Microsoft Xbox and
played through a Sony STR-DB930 amplifier.
PC games reviewed by the editor are on:
Since Nov 2005: Intel Pentium D 830 3.0Ghz, 1Gb RAM, 128Mb nVidia GeForce 6700XL, Windows XP
Since Aug 2003: Intel Pentium 4 2.66Ghz, 512Mb RAM, 128Mb GeForce4 MX440 graphics, Windows XP
Since May 2003: Intel Pentium 4 2.6Ghz, 512Mb RAM, 128Mb ATI Radeon 9600TX graphics, Windows XP
Since Jun 2002: Intel Pentium III 600Mhz, 384Mb RAM, Windows 98 SE, 64Mb ATI Radeon 8500LE
Since May 2000: Intel Pentium III 600Mhz, 384Mb RAM, Windows 98 SE, Voodoo 3 3000 AGP